[MiQP-Mail] MIQP exchange

[Dave Pruett]

Ted

To answer your question, the MiQP website is correct.

MiQP rules are not linked to OHQP rules.  While we understand the logic 
that led OhQP to change, the feedback we've gotten from MiQP 
participants over the years seems to overwhelmingly support 
QSOnr/location.  It's really only an issue for mobiles and multi-ops and 
we've tried to write the MiQP rules to allow sufficient flexibility for 
both to prevent it from being a legitimate problem.

So while I won't say that we'll NEVER change at some point in the 
future, at this point in time there are no plans or behind-the-scenes 
discussions to do so.

I ran OhQP from Summit County last year as NZ8O and got a perspective on 
the RST vs. QSOnr question.  But we're always trying to give MiQP 
participants what they want, regardless of what other QSO parties do.

73, Dave/K8CC


On 4/9/2016 11:20 PM, tdm1 at bignet.net wrote:
>   
>
> Hello Dave
>
> What is the correct exchange for MIQP this year?
>
> Last year the OHQP switched to RST/CTY. So far this year, both the MIQP
> website and the WA7BNM contest calendar show Serial/CTY. Which is it?
> Please post your answer on the MIQP reflector.
>
> Thanks! Call early and often.
>
> Ted W8UE
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.miqp.org/pipermail/miqp-mail_miqp.org/attachments/20160409/658c2e3b/attachment.html>